Peterson jury pool loses, gains people
MAY 13, 2004

Jury selection in the Scott Peterson trial took two steps forward this morning but three
steps back, leaving the final pool of qualified
jurors at one less than Wednesday's total.

On the day the Peterson jury had originally been scheduled to be seated, Judge Alfred Delucchi
dismissed several jurors from having to serve. One juror had changed jobs, taking a position with
a company that will not pay for five months of jury service. It was not clear why he excused the others.


Seventy people are now in the final jury pool.

About 60 prospective jurors arrived at the Hall of Justice and Records here
today only to learn they would have to return May 27. They were a part of the
initial 1,000 people summoned as jurors in the Peterson case.


But Delucchi extended jury selection after failing to find enough people from which to
pick the panel of 1 regular  jurors and six alternates. Three hundred more people are
scheduled to come in Monday and Tuesday to begin filling out
questionnaires.

Some people who returned today asked to be excused. One person did not show up.
Delucchi cautioned the crowd to return May 27 or face "serious consequences."

"I don't want to threaten anybody, but you're under a court order to be here," he said.
"I know this is an imposition on your time. But there may be somebody in blue
knocking on the door at your place of employment" if they don't show up.


Three people from a new crop of jurors called in on Monday were qualified this morning.

-JUROR 302 - A woman in her 50's, said her mother was a lawyer and her father was a judge. Both
worked in another country, and it was something that would not enter into her deliberations
if she was selected, she said. She said she got most of her news from television and had
watched a cable movie about the case. She could set that aside, she said, and be a fair
juror.  "He doesn't look like a guilty person," she said. "His looks don't convey guilt."


-JUROR 6917 - A woman in her 60's who is a retired human resources worker, said her
grandson was kidnapped more than two decades ago. The boy's other grandmother
abducted the boy and delivered him to the child's other parent, she said. For four years,
11 months and two days, she said, the boy's location was not known. It was a traumatic
experience, she said, but not one that would color her judgment in the Peterson case.


-JUROR 6869 - A woman in her 50's, works at Pacific Gas & Electric and said she was a moderate
follower of the Peterson case. She did not have enough information to decide, she said, adding
that the media focused on Peterson as if he was guilty. Unlike other jurors who have
stared directly at the judge or lawyer during the talking, she glanced at Peterson several
times. Once, she fixed her gaze on the man accused of killing his wife Laci, and the
couple's unborn son before answering that she could hand down a death sentence.
But stated, "I don't see a motive," she said. "I haven't seen anything about motive."


HOME    INDEX    LACI    SCOTT    TRIAL NEWS    JURORS    COURT DATES
Thanks to LilCaliGirl
LACI & CONNER
"Somebody is thinking of you and smiling"
TRIBUTE
HOME

INDEX